Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Cobb Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06033001102 ·
Lake, CA · pop 1,059 · 67% of tract blocks fall in Cobb
Eviction risk in Cobb centers on tract 06033001102, which scores $1/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 1,059 residents. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 25% of renter households, a moderate level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $90,920 a year. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 8%Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units583
Renter share11.1%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$90,920
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cobb
Moderate
Within county
5th percentile
#20 of 21 tracts In Lake
Very Low
Within state
16th percentile
#7,640 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
43th percentile
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cobb and the region
Centroid at 38.8095, -122.7319 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cobb scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cobb
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cobb
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cobb
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cobb
4.6
How Cobb compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.0%Housing insecurity
5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
10.0%Food insecurity
9.9%SNAP enrollment
6.3%Transit barriers
5.2%No health insurance
16.2%Frequent mental distress
29.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cobb
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cobb, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lake County average of 6.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06033001102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06033001102?
Census tract 06033001102 in Cobb scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 06033001102?
4.9% of residents in tract 06033001102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,059.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 06033001102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 28th, minority 17th, housing 12th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 06033001102 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 06033001102 compare to Cobb overall?
Tract 06033001102 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Cobb at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cobb; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.