Canoga Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037134521 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,944 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037134521 in the Canoga Park area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,944 residents. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.2046, -118.5952 · click any tract to drill in
Why Canoga Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Canoga Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 79%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 88%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Canoga Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 34.1%Housing insecurity
- 15.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 43.1%Food insecurity
- 39.3%SNAP enrollment
- 20.2%Transit barriers
- 27.7%No health insurance
- 20.9%Frequent mental distress
- 41.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Canoga Park
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 39.3% against 15.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
This is renter territory: 87% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $53,413 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
The poverty rate is 28%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 62% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.
At $1,578 a month, rents run 18% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037134521
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037134521?
What is the average rent in tract 06037134521?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037134521?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037134521?
Is tract 06037134521 considered part of Canoga Park?
What share of households in tract 06037134521 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037134521 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037134521 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.