Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,393 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Washington Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037185101 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,780 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

06037185101 is a census tract in the Mount Washington area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,780 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 35% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,037
Renter share64.3%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$82,521

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Mount Washington
Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#840 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,144 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#1,974 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1025, -118.2060 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Washington scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,879 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Mount Washington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Washington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.98.9This tracttract 185101Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Washington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Washington

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Cost burden runs 46% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #4,393 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.5/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Average gross rent is $1,879, close to the Los Angeles average.

Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $82,521. 64% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037185101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037185101?

Census tract 06037185101 in the Mount Washington neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037185101?

Median gross rent is $1,879/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037185101?

2.9% of residents in tract 06037185101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,780.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037185101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 58th, minority 78th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 06037185101 considered part of Mount Washington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037185101 fall within Mount Washington (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037185101 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037185101 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037185101 scores 8.9/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037185101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related