Silver Lake Heights Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037195100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,042 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 8.4/10, tract 06037195100 in the Silver Lake Heights area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,042 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1022, -118.2670 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Lake Heights scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Lake Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 65%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 70%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Lake Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.6%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.4%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 21.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Lake Heights
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 6.6% against 17.8% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.4% against 11.3% nationally.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 2.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $162,066, annual rent is just 15%. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037195100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037195100?
What is the average rent in tract 06037195100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037195100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037195100?
Is tract 06037195100 considered part of Silver Lake Heights?
What share of households in tract 06037195100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037195100 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037195100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.