Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

The Flats Eviction Risk: High , Beverly Hills

Tract 06037214904 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,390 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 06037214904 covers part of the The Flats area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 39% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units924
Renter share75.8%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$121,439

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In The Flats
Moderate
Within parent city
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#1,059 of 1,117 tracts In Beverly Hills
Very Low
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#1,459 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region

Centroid at 34.0743, -118.3857 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Flats scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,536 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.0

How The Flats compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Flats risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 214904Beverly Hills: 9.19.1Beverly Hillsparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Flats. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Flats

Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Average gross rent is $2,536, 31% above the Los Angeles average. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.

49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037214904

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037214904?

Census tract 06037214904 in the The Flats neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037214904?

Median gross rent is $2,536/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037214904?

2.3% of residents in tract 06037214904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,390.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037214904?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 2th, minority 26th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 06037214904 considered part of The Flats?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037214904 fall within The Flats (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037214904 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037214904 compare to Beverly Hills overall?

Tract 06037214904 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037214904 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills

Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related