Flower District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037226002 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,960 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
06037226002 is a census tract in the Flower District area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,960 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0326, -118.2478 · click any tract to drill in
Why Flower District scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Flower District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 82%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Flower District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.8%Housing insecurity
- 10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.2%Food insecurity
- 24.0%SNAP enrollment
- 12.4%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 31.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Flower District
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. This is renter territory: 86% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 37% of average household income of $51,917, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. At $1,604 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
SNAP participation runs 24.0% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. 52% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037226002
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037226002?
What is the average rent in tract 06037226002?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037226002?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037226002?
Is tract 06037226002 considered part of Flower District?
What share of households in tract 06037226002 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037226002 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.