Van Ness Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037234901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,954 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037234901 in the Van Ness area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,954. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9818, -118.3287 · click any tract to drill in
Why Van Ness scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Van Ness compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 98
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 97%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 93%Grade C
- 7%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Van Ness. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.2%Housing insecurity
- 17.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.8%Food insecurity
- 42.6%SNAP enrollment
- 19.5%Transit barriers
- 16.4%No health insurance
- 20.8%Frequent mental distress
- 42.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Van Ness
At $1,050 a month, rents run 46% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. SNAP participation runs 42.6% against 15.2% nationally.
This is renter territory: 97% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Food insecurity runs 39.8% against 17.8% nationally. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
42% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037234901
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037234901?
What is the average rent in tract 06037234901?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037234901?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037234901?
Is tract 06037234901 considered part of Van Ness?
What share of households in tract 06037234901 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037234901 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037234901 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.