Florence Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037239502 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,624 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 06037239502 sits in the Florence area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9693, -118.2630 · click any tract to drill in
Why Florence scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Florence compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 74%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 85%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Florence. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 35.5%Housing insecurity
- 17.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.3%Food insecurity
- 42.7%SNAP enrollment
- 21.2%Transit barriers
- 25.1%No health insurance
- 21.7%Frequent mental distress
- 42.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Florence
Food insecurity runs 44.3% against 17.8% nationally. Cost burden runs 68% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Set annual rent against average income of $60,350 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Adults with no health insurance runs 25.1% against 11.3% nationally.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Average gross rent is $1,666, 14% below the Los Angeles average.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
61% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037239502
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037239502?
What is the average rent in tract 06037239502?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037239502?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037239502?
Is tract 06037239502 considered part of Florence?
What share of households in tract 06037239502 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037239502 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037239502 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.