Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Lamanda Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pasadena
Tract 06037463300 ·
Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,934 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 06037463300 covers part of the Lamanda Park area of San Pasqual, CA, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,934 residents. It sits 2.6 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 22%Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units853
Renter share41.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$138,542
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25th percentile
#7 of 9 tracts In Lamanda Park
Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Pasadena
Moderate
Within county
9th percentile
#2,280 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
19th percentile
#7,378 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pasadena and the region
Centroid at 34.1392, -118.1025 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lamanda Park scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,127 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
5.0
How Lamanda Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
26%Socioeconomic
13%Household composition
70%Racial/ethnic minority
28%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
35%Grade A
54%Grade B
11%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lamanda Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.6%Housing insecurity
3.5%Utility-shutoff threat
8.4%Food insecurity
6.6%SNAP enrollment
4.9%Transit barriers
4.2%No health insurance
12.4%Frequent mental distress
22.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lamanda Park
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.6/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10.
47% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #20,506 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.1/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037463300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037463300?
Census tract 06037463300 in the Lamanda Park neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037463300?
Median gross rent is $2,127/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037463300?
6.6% of residents in tract 06037463300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,934.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037463300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 13th, minority 70th, housing 28th.
Q5
Is tract 06037463300 considered part of Lamanda Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037463300 fall within Lamanda Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037463300 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037463300 compare to Pasadena overall?
Tract 06037463300 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Pasadena at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037463300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.