Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037501501 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,022 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 06037501501 covers part of the Rose Hill area of Whittier, CA, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,022 residents. It sits 2.4 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 10% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units780
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$132,857

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 10 tracts In Rose Hill
Very Low
Within parent city
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 20 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#2,255 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,047 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0017, -118.0208 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,313 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.3

How Rose Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 501501Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 43% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10.

At $2,313 a month, rents run 21% over what the rest of Whittier commands. SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 10.7% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 78th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037501501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037501501?

Census tract 06037501501 in the Rose Hill neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037501501?

Median gross rent is $2,313/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037501501?

4.0% of residents in tract 06037501501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,022.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037501501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 20th, minority 77th, housing 5th.
Q5

Is tract 06037501501 considered part of Rose Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037501501 fall within Rose Hill (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037501501 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037501501 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037501501 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037501501 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related