South Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037532800 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,392 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037532800 in the South Park area of Florence-Graham, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,392. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9864, -118.2521 · click any tract to drill in
Why South Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow South Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 72%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 88%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within South Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 36.5%Housing insecurity
- 16.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 46.1%Food insecurity
- 41.5%SNAP enrollment
- 21.5%Transit barriers
- 30.4%No health insurance
- 21.7%Frequent mental distress
- 44.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in South Park
Food insecurity runs 46.1% against 17.8% nationally. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10. Housing insecurity runs 36.5% against 14.2% nationally.
Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 67% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $48,952 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
This is renter territory: 66% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
The poverty rate is 28%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,431, close to the Florence-Graham average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037532800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037532800?
What is the average rent in tract 06037532800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037532800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037532800?
Is tract 06037532800 considered part of South Park?
What share of households in tract 06037532800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037532800 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037532800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.