Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037535102 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,570 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 9.8/10, tract 06037535102 in the Watts area of Florence-Graham, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,570 residents. Cost burden runs 72% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9587, -118.2488 · click any tract to drill in
Why Watts scores 9.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Watts compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 81%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 77%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.2%Housing insecurity
- 14.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.9%Food insecurity
- 36.3%SNAP enrollment
- 18.7%Transit barriers
- 24.5%No health insurance
- 20.1%Frequent mental distress
- 40.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Watts
34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10.
Food insecurity runs 39.9% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.5/10.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Average gross rent is $1,697, 12% above the Florence-Graham average. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #2,210 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.3 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037535102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037535102?
What is the average rent in tract 06037535102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037535102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037535102?
Is tract 06037535102 considered part of Watts?
What share of households in tract 06037535102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037535102 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037535102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.