Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037535400 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,434 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 06037535400 covers part of the Watts area of Florence-Graham, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,434 residents. Severe burden reaches 40%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 23% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units742
Renter share56.5%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate30.5%
Median income$57,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 25 tracts In Watts
Very High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 13 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#668 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9538, -118.2349 · click any tract to drill in

Why Watts scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
30.5% poverty · this tract
7.6
Supply constraint
$1,646 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.3

How Watts compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Watts risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 535400Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Watts

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $57,000, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Adults with no health insurance runs 28.0% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Cost burden runs 58% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Average gross rent is $1,646, 8% above the Florence-Graham average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037535400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037535400?

Census tract 06037535400 in the Watts neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037535400?

Median gross rent is $1,646/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037535400?

30.5% of residents in tract 06037535400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,434.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037535400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 95th, minority 99th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 06037535400 considered part of Watts?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037535400 fall within Watts (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037535400 struggle to pay rent?

About 35.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037535400 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037535400 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037535400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 59% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related