Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037535400 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,434 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 06037535400 covers part of the Watts area of Florence-Graham, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,434 residents. Severe burden reaches 40%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9538, -118.2349 · click any tract to drill in
Why Watts scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Watts compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 95%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 59%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 35.9%Housing insecurity
- 16.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 45.7%Food insecurity
- 42.6%SNAP enrollment
- 21.4%Transit barriers
- 28.0%No health insurance
- 21.6%Frequent mental distress
- 44.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Watts
What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $57,000, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
Adults with no health insurance runs 28.0% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Cost burden runs 58% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Average gross rent is $1,646, 8% above the Florence-Graham average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037535400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037535400?
What is the average rent in tract 06037535400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037535400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037535400?
Is tract 06037535400 considered part of Watts?
What share of households in tract 06037535400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037535400 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037535400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.