Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037535607 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,469 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 06037535607 sits in the Watts area of South Gate, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.4/10. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 18% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,066
Renter share34.8%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate13.4%
Median income$71,398

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 25 tracts In Watts
Very Low
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 21 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#1,542 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9419, -118.2211 · click any tract to drill in

Why Watts scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.4% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.0

How Watts compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Watts risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 535607Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Watts

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Housing insecurity runs 28.1% against 14.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 24.7% against 11.3% nationally.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10. 49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

Average gross rent is $1,684, 10% above the South Gate average. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.2/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $71,398.

35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037535607

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037535607?

Census tract 06037535607 in the Watts neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037535607?

Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037535607?

13.4% of residents in tract 06037535607 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,469.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037535607?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 85th, minority 99th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 06037535607 considered part of Watts?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037535607 fall within Watts (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037535607 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037535607 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037535607 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037535607 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related