Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Belmont Shore Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037577200 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,770 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 06037577200 sits in the Belmont Shore area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8/10. It is home to 5,770 residents. Cost burden runs 34% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 50% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units3,255
Renter share76.0%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$108,668

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In Belmont Shore
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#1,640 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#3,534 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7526, -118.1587 · click any tract to drill in

Why Belmont Shore scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,993 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Belmont Shore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Belmont Shore risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 577200Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Belmont Shore. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Belmont Shore

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10. 76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 8.1% against 15.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037577200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037577200?

Census tract 06037577200 in the Belmont Shore neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037577200?

Median gross rent is $1,993/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037577200?

7.6% of residents in tract 06037577200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,770.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037577200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 3th, minority 57th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 06037577200 considered part of Belmont Shore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037577200 fall within Belmont Shore (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037577200 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037577200 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037577200 scores 8/10, lower than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037577200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related