Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Acacia Knolls Eviction Risk: Lower , Laguna Hills

Tract 06059062636 · Orange, CA · pop 3,908 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 06059062636 runs through the Acacia Knolls area of Laguna Hills. With 3,908 residents, it scores 5.8/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 70% of US census tracts.

51% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,895 a month while the average household earns $122,880 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 55% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 27% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,480
Renter share55.1%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$122,880

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Acacia Knolls
Very Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 10 tracts In Laguna Hills
Elevated
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#483 of 613 tracts In Orange
Low
Within state
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#8,057 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Laguna Hills and the region

Centroid at 33.5832, -117.7171 · click any tract to drill in

Why Acacia Knolls scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,895 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Laguna Hills
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Laguna Hills
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Laguna Hills
5.3

How Acacia Knolls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Acacia Knolls risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 062636Laguna Hills: 7.77.7Laguna Hillsparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Acacia Knolls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Acacia Knolls

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Laguna Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059062636

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059062636?

Census tract 06059062636 in the Acacia Knolls neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059062636?

Median gross rent is $2,895/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059062636?

6.8% of residents in tract 06059062636 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,908.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059062636?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 30th, minority 67th, housing 37th.
Q5

Is tract 06059062636 considered part of Acacia Knolls?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059062636 fall within Acacia Knolls (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059062636 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059062636 compare to Laguna Hills overall?

Tract 06059062636 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Laguna Hills at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Laguna Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Laguna Hills

Top eight tracts in Laguna Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related