Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally

Corona Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06065040821 · Riverside, CA · pop 5,773

The Elevated-tier score of 6.5/10 for census tract 06065040821 reflects conditions in Corona, California. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 57% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,329 a month against an average household income of $93,980 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 25% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,028
Renter share58.6%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate9.2%
Median income$93,980

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 33 tracts In Corona
Elevated
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#346 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,383 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#32,735 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Corona and the region

Centroid at 33.8911, -117.5285 · click any tract to drill in

Why Corona scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Corona
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.2% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$2,329 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Corona
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Corona
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Corona
6.4

How Corona compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Corona risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 040821Corona: 7.77.7Coronaparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Corona

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Corona eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065040821

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065040821?

Census tract 06065040821 in Corona scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065040821?

Median gross rent is $2,329/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065040821?

9.2% of residents in tract 06065040821 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,773.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065040821?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 69th, minority 80th, housing 38th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06065040821 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06065040821 compare to Corona overall?

Tract 06065040821 scores 4.5/10, lower than the parent city of Corona at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Corona eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Corona

Top eight tracts in Corona ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related