Tract 06071010300 ·
San Bernardino, CA · pop 3,357 · 1% of tract blocks fall in Baker
Tract 06071010300 covers Baker in California. Home to 3,357 residents, it scores 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 96% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 51% of renter households, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $856 monthly, set against $53,162 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%Stable renters 17%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,304
Renter share34.5%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate25.4%
Median income$53,162
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Baker
Moderate
Within county
93th percentile
#35 of 466 tracts In San Bernardino
Very High
Within state
88th percentile
#1,113 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
97th percentile
#2,438 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Baker and the region
Centroid at 35.1479, -115.8784 · click any tract to drill in
Why Baker scores 7.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Baker
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
25.4% poverty · this tract
6.4
Supply constraint
$856 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Baker
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Baker
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Baker
8.2
How Baker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
18.7%Housing insecurity
11.1%Utility-shutoff threat
26.8%Food insecurity
29.6%SNAP enrollment
13.6%Transit barriers
12.7%No health insurance
19.9%Frequent mental distress
40.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Baker
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Baker, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the San Bernardino County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 18.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06071010300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06071010300?
Census tract 06071010300 in Baker scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06071010300?
Median gross rent is $856/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06071010300?
25.4% of residents in tract 06071010300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,357.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06071010300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 94th, minority 67th, housing 96th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06071010300 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06071010300 compare to Baker overall?
Tract 06071010300 scores 7.8/10, lower than the parent city of Baker at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Baker; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.