Skip to content
Map of San Bernardino County, CA eviction risk by city, county average 7.7 out of 10
County brief·Updated July 25, 2026

San Bernardino County, California Eviction Risk: High

53 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of San Bernardino (8.8) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
8
HIGH

Ranked #28 of 58 CA counties

2.1M residents · 53 cities · 466 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

San Bernardino County eviction risk score history

Min2.5 Average4.3 Now8
10 5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.6 1994 · score 3.6 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.4 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.5 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.5 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.5 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 4.4 2009 · score 4.7 2010 · score 4.8 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.9 2013 · score 4.9 2014 · score 4.9 2015 · score 4.9 2016 · score 5.5 2017 · score 5.7 2018 · score 5.8 2019 · score 6.6 2020 · score 8.9 2021 · score 8.6 2022 · score 8.2 2023 · score 7.9 2024 · score 8.2 2025 · score 8.1 2026 · score 8.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

San Bernardino County's 53 cities range from 8.1/10 to a peak of 8.7/10 in Adelanto, with the county averaging 8.7/10 (High risk). Ranked 4th of 58 California counties by eviction risk, placing it in the state's higher-risk tier.

How San Bernardino County ranks in California

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Moderate
#28 of 58 CA counties 8.0 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#28 of 58 counties in California for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Very High
#1 of 51 states (statewide) 110.7 index
Cost of living, 100th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #1 of 51 states on overall cost of living (10.7% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Very High
#2 of 51 states (statewide) 154.3 index
Housing services cost, 98th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #2 of 51 states on housing services (54.3% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
High
#15 of 58 CA counties 35.5% of income
Income spent on rent, 75th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 58 counties in California on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for California

State-specific playbooks
California Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
California Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
California Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
California Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
California Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in San Bernardino County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 San Bernardino Pop 222,724 · 37.6% income · $1,508 rent · Dem 222,724 8.1 37.6% $1,508 Dem
002 Fontana Pop 214,169 · 32.1% income · $1,839 rent · Dem 214,169 7.8 32.1% $1,839 Dem
003 Ontario Pop 180,547 · 36.5% income · $2,030 rent · Dem 180,547 7.9 36.5% $2,030 Dem
004 Rancho Cucamonga Pop 175,411 · 33.7% income · $2,357 rent · Dem 175,411 7.8 33.7% $2,357 Dem
005 Victorville Pop 137,627 · 39.4% income · $1,618 rent · Dem 137,627 8.3 39.4% $1,618 Dem
006 Rialto Pop 104,143 · 33.8% income · $1,759 rent · Dem 104,143 8.1 33.8% $1,759 Dem
007 Hesperia Pop 100,775 · 34.8% income · $1,590 rent · Dem 100,775 8.2 34.8% $1,590 Dem
008 Chino Pop 92,652 · 35.7% income · $2,336 rent · Dem 92,652 7.9 35.7% $2,336 Dem
009 Upland Pop 79,257 · 31.2% income · $2,029 rent · Dem 79,257 7.8 31.2% $2,029 Dem
010 Chino Hills Pop 77,927 · 34.5% income · $2,894 rent · Dem 77,927 8.0 34.5% $2,894 Dem
011 Apple Valley Pop 75,473 · 36.8% income · $1,444 rent · Dem 75,473 7.9 36.8% $1,444 Dem
012 Redlands Pop 73,375 · 29.4% income · $2,005 rent · Dem 73,375 7.8 29.4% $2,005 Dem
013 Highland Pop 56,675 · 39.2% income · $1,629 rent · Dem 56,675 8.0 39.2% $1,629 Dem
014 Yucaipa Pop 54,421 · 31.1% income · $1,711 rent · Dem 54,421 7.7 31.1% $1,711 Dem
015 Colton Pop 53,772 · 33.5% income · $1,661 rent · Dem 53,772 7.9 33.5% $1,661 Dem
016 Adelanto Pop 37,964 · 36.2% income · $1,437 rent · Dem 37,964 8.7 36.2% $1,437 Dem
017 Montclair Pop 37,810 · 36.9% income · $1,889 rent · Dem 37,810 7.8 36.9% $1,889 Dem
018 Twentynine Palms Pop 27,355 · 31.2% income · $1,352 rent · Dem 27,355 8.0 31.2% $1,352 Dem
019 Bloomington Pop 25,698 · 32.4% income · $1,609 rent · Dem 25,698 7.8 32.4% $1,609 Dem
020 Loma Linda Pop 25,122 · 34.0% income · $1,855 rent · Dem 25,122 8.0 34.0% $1,855 Dem
021 Barstow Pop 25,100 · 31.2% income · $1,091 rent · Dem 25,100 8.6 31.2% $1,091 Dem
022 Yucca Valley Pop 21,770 · 37.2% income · $1,428 rent · Dem 21,770 8.2 37.2% $1,428 Dem
023 Phelan Pop 18,496 · 51.0% income · $1,525 rent · Dem 18,496 8.5 51.0% $1,525 Dem
024 Grand Terrace Pop 13,078 · 34.7% income · $2,024 rent · Dem 13,078 7.7 34.7% $2,024 Dem
025 Muscoy Pop 12,025 · 35.4% income · $1,747 rent · Dem 12,025 8.0 35.4% $1,747 Dem
026 Big Bear City Pop 11,431 · 37.2% income · $1,854 rent · Dem 11,431 8.1 37.2% $1,854 Dem
027 Lake Arrowhead Pop 10,639 · 36.4% income · $1,875 rent · Dem 10,639 7.9 36.4% $1,875 Dem
028 Crestline Pop 9,835 · 31.7% income · $1,538 rent · Dem 9,835 7.7 31.7% $1,538 Dem
029 Mentone Pop 9,514 · 51.0% income · $1,472 rent · Dem 9,514 7.5 51.0% $1,472 Dem
030 Spring Valley Lake Pop 9,483 · 33.8% income · $2,350 rent · Dem 9,483 8.0 33.8% $2,350 Dem
031 Oak Hills Pop 9,013 · 19.5% income · $1,724 rent · Dem 9,013 7.7 19.5% $1,724 Dem
032 Fort Irwin Pop 8,419 · 28.3% income · $1,818 rent · Dem 8,419 8.2 28.3% $1,818 Dem
033 Silver Lakes Pop 6,977 · 21.2% income · $1,720 rent · Dem 6,977 7.7 21.2% $1,720 Dem
034 Joshua Tree Pop 6,234 · 34.6% income · $1,246 rent · Dem 6,234 8.2 34.6% $1,246 Dem
035 Lucerne Valley Pop 5,957 · 51.0% income · $1,181 rent · Dem 5,957 8.8 51.0% $1,181 Dem
036 Wrightwood Pop 5,067 · 39.5% income · $1,833 rent · Dem 5,067 8.0 39.5% $1,833 Dem
037 Big Bear Lake Pop 5,041 · 36.7% income · $1,454 rent · Dem 5,041 8.1 36.7% $1,454 Dem
038 Running Springs Pop 4,917 · 47.0% income · $1,804 rent · Dem 4,917 7.9 47.0% $1,804 Dem
039 Needles Pop 4,872 · 33.8% income · $745 rent · Dem 4,872 8.6 33.8% $745 Dem
040 Morongo Valley Pop 4,209 · 28.2% income · $1,354 rent · Dem 4,209 8.1 28.2% $1,354 Dem
041 Mountain View Acres Pop 3,512 · 51.0% income · $1,658 rent · Dem 3,512 8.2 51.0% $1,658 Dem
042 San Antonio Heights Pop 3,458 · 46.3% income · $1,683 rent · Dem 3,458 7.7 46.3% $1,683 Dem
043 Lenwood Pop 3,383 · 26.3% income · $1,176 rent · Dem 3,383 8.1 26.3% $1,176 Dem
044 Homestead Valley Pop 2,689 · 51.0% income · $1,047 rent · Dem 2,689 8.6 51.0% $1,047 Dem
045 Searles Valley Pop 1,713 · 19.2% income · $819 rent · Dem 1,713 7.7 19.2% $819 Dem
046 Big River Pop 1,140 · 19.7% income · $839 rent · Dem 1,140 8.3 19.7% $839 Dem
047 Yermo Pop 958 · 13.1% income · $681 rent · Dem 958 8.0 13.1% $681 Dem
048 Lytle Creek Pop 672 · 63.2% income · $1,221 rent · Dem 672 7.9 63.2% $1,221 Dem
049 Oak Glen Pop 510 · 46.3% income · $1,743 rent · Dem 510 7.1 46.3% $1,743 Dem
050 Baker Pop 339 · 33.5% income · $877 rent · Dem 339 8.1 33.5% $877 Dem
051 Tecopa Pop 201 · 33.9% income · $1,206 rent · Dem 201 7.7 33.9% $1,206 Dem
052 Charleston View Pop 45 · 33.9% income · $1,206 rent · Dem 45 7.8 33.9% $1,206 Dem
053 Shoshone Pop 18 · 33.9% income · $1,206 rent · Dem 18 7.7 33.9% $1,206 Dem

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

San Bernardino County scores 8.1/10 (High) across its 53 cities, placing it fourth of 58 California eviction laws counties by eviction risk. Only three counties in the state are riskier, and 54 are more landlord-friendly, which tells you something concrete: this is not a peripheral concern. With a county population exceeding 2 million and an average rent of $1,834, the landlord-investor market here carries real weight, but operating conditions are demanding. Rent burden averages 35% of household income across the county, a figure that pressures tenants and translates directly into elevated non-payment risk for landlords. Working with experienced property management in San Bernardino County is one of the more effective ways to keep that exposure under control.

The county-wide average obscures a wide spread. City scores range from 6.2 at the lower end to 8.7 at the top, a gap of 2.5 points that matters enormously to underwriting decisions. A portfolio concentrated in the right sub-markets looks very different from one that drifted into the wrong zip codes. That intra-county range, combined with the sheer geographic size of the county, means a blanket county-level read is insufficient; investors need to drill to the city level before committing capital.

The cities inside San Bernardino County

Lucerne Valley leads the county at 8.8/10, the highest single-city score in the county and tied for the most adverse conditions anywhere in this market. The city of San Bernardino (population 222,724) and Barstow both follow at 8.6/10, with Rialto (population 104,143) and Highland each at 8/10. Victorville (population 137,627) comes in at 8.3/10, and both Hesperia and Fort Irwin reach 8.2/10. These are not marginal differences; cities at 8.5 or above represent genuinely high operational friction for landlords relative to the rest of California.

At the other end of the spectrum, Rancho Cucamonga and Chino each score 7.8/10 among the county's larger cities, while Ontario reaches 7.9/10. Risk is hyper-local here: Rancho Cucamonga and Adelanto share the same county, yet their scores are nearly 1.8 points apart. Landlords assembling a San Bernardino County portfolio should treat each city as its own risk environment. San Bernardino County property managers with ground-level sub-market knowledge are worth consulting before acquisition decisions are finalized.

State-level laws that apply here

Every rental in San Bernardino County operates under California eviction laws state law, which sets some of the most layered landlord-tenant rules in the country. For non-payment of rent, a curable lease violation, or an incurable nuisance or substantial-damage situation, the required notice period is 3 days. No-cause terminations require 30 days for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more. Properties covered by AB 1482 also require just cause for eviction and are subject to a rent cap of 5% plus CPI, capped at 10% annually. Understanding the full California eviction laws eviction process before serving any notice is not optional; procedural missteps restart the clock entirely.

On costs: court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees typically range from $1,500 to $4,500, depending on whether the case is contested. An uncontested eviction resolves in 35 to 60 days; a contested case stretches to 75 to 180 days. California eviction costs are a material line item in any pro forma, and investors who underestimate them routinely get surprised. California tenant protections, including source-of-income protection and the anti-retaliation statute, add additional layers that affect screening and management practices from day one.

With a poverty rate of 13.5% and renters making up 38.6% of households across the county, the underlying demand drivers are clear, but so is the baseline risk. The city grid above breaks down every one of the 53 cities individually so you can identify which sub-markets fit your risk tolerance.

Historical eviction filings in San Bernardino County

From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in San Bernardino County declined 42%. The peak was 19,413 filings in 2010.1

Annual filings 2010–2017 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in San Bernardino County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2010: 19,413 filings2011: 17,801 filings2012: 16,070 filings2013: 14,500 filings2014: 13,758 filings2015: 13,023 filings2016: 12,141 filings2017: 11,350 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How San Bernardino County compares

San Bernardino County's average eviction risk score of 8.1/10 places it among the most challenging markets in California, ranking 4th of 58 counties statewide, with only 3 counties presenting greater landlord risk. Among comparable California counties, Alameda County scores 7.9/10 and sits above San Bernardino, while Santa Clara County (8.1/10), Sacramento County (7.6/10), Contra Costa County (7.1/10), and Kern County (6.9/10) all fall below it.

The intra-county spread from 7.1 to 8.8 is wide, meaning city selection within San Bernardino County matters enormously: an investor in Rancho Cucamonga (7.8/10) faces meaningfully different conditions than one in Adelanto (8.7/10), even though both operate under the same California state just-cause and rent-cap framework.

Peer counties in California

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Riverside County eviction risk
7.9
/ 10 · High
Pop. 2.4M
Peer county
Orange County eviction risk
7.9
/ 10 · High
Pop. 3.2M
Peer county
Contra Costa County eviction risk
8.1
/ 10 · High
Pop. 1.2M
Peer county
San Mateo County eviction risk
8
/ 10 · High
Pop. 725K

Where eviction risk concentrates in San Bernardino County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about San Bernardino County

Q1

What does the 8/10 county-average mean?

The 8/10 county-average is a population-weighted mean of 53 municipal landlord-risk scores. The internal range is 7.1 to 8.8.
Q2

What share of San Bernardino County households rent?

About 38.6% of occupied units in San Bernardino County are renter-occupied, per ACS 2023 5-year data.