Qmunity District Eviction Risk: Moderate , San Jose
Tract 06085500800 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 4,483 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06085500800 (the Qmunity District area of San Jose, California) comes in at 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 79% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 45% of renter households, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,965 a month against an average household income of $146,986 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 79% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.3306, -121.8956 · click any tract to drill in
Why Qmunity District scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Qmunity District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 35%Socioeconomic
- 16%Household composition
- 74%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 14%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.1%Food insecurity
- 9.9%SNAP enrollment
- 7.2%Transit barriers
- 7.3%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Qmunity District
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06085500800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085500800?
What is the average rent in tract 06085500800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085500800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085500800?
Is tract 06085500800 considered part of Qmunity District?
What share of households in tract 06085500800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085500800 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085500800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.