Little Italy Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10. 16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Disability prevalence runs 19.1% against 31.5% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. 48% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Santa Clara County average of 43.5%.

Against the Santa Clara County average of 8.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 4.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.