Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Saigon Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

Tract 06085503105 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 2,139 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 06085503105 covers part of the Little Saigon area of San Jose, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,139. Against Santa Clara County at 43.5%, 65% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 25% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units726
Renter share72.2%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$60,588

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 12 tracts In Little Saigon
Moderate
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 216 tracts In San Jose
High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3262, -121.8588 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Saigon scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$898 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Little Saigon compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Saigon risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 5031059.0San Joseparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Saigon. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Saigon

Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $898, 66% below the San Jose average.

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.

It sits 1.9 points above the Santa Clara County average of 8.0. 72% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $60,588, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085503105

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085503105?

Census tract 06085503105 in the Little Saigon neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085503105?

Median gross rent is $898/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085503105?

15.9% of residents in tract 06085503105 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,139.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085503105?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 89th, minority 95th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06085503105 considered part of Little Saigon?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085503105 fall within Little Saigon (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085503105 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085503105 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085503105 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085503105 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related