Communications Hill Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085503123 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,777 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Census tract 06085503123 covers part of the Communications Hill area of San Jose, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,777. Against Santa Clara County at 43.5%, 69% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.2977, -121.8778 · click any tract to drill in
Why Communications Hill scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Communications Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 98
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 73%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 1%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Communications Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.4%Housing insecurity
- 10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.9%Food insecurity
- 22.9%SNAP enrollment
- 12.6%Transit barriers
- 14.4%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 35.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Communications Hill
Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.
Set annual rent against average income of $60,119 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.
Against the Santa Clara County average of 8.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
At $1,989 a month, rents run 25% under what the rest of San Jose commands. SNAP participation runs 22.9% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 24.9% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06085503123
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085503123?
What is the average rent in tract 06085503123?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085503123?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085503123?
Is tract 06085503123 considered part of Communications Hill?
What share of households in tract 06085503123 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085503123 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085503123 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.