Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Portugal Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

Tract 06085503710 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,334 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06085503710 in the Little Portugal area of San Jose, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,334 residents. Average gross rent is $1,167, 56% below the San Jose average.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 43% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units1,027
Renter share75.3%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate11.2%
Median income$58,956

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Little Portugal
Very High
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 216 tracts In San Jose
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3547, -121.8470 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Portugal scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.2% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,167 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Little Portugal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Portugal risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 5037109.0San Joseparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Portugal. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Portugal

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. 75% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

It sits 1.9 points above the Santa Clara County average of 8.0. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.5/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 43% of renters.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $58,956.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085503710

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085503710?

Census tract 06085503710 in the Little Portugal neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085503710?

Median gross rent is $1,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085503710?

11.2% of residents in tract 06085503710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,334.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085503710?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 100th, minority 95th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06085503710 considered part of Little Portugal?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085503710 fall within Little Portugal (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085503710 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085503710 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085503710 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085503710 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related