Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Dennison Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Pike Creek

Tract 10003013612 · New Castle County, DE · pop 5,541 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 10003013612 covers the Dennison Ridge area of Pike Creek, home to 5,541 residents. For landlords it grades 1.1/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #28,965 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 40% of renter households, a high level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,347 a month while the average household earns $146,477 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 7% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,947
Renter share11.4%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$146,477

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Dennison Ridge
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Pike Creek
Very High
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#144 of 144 tracts In New Castle County
Very Low
Within state
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#253 of 259 tracts In Delaware
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pike Creek and the region

Centroid at 39.7585, -75.6927 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dennison Ridge scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pike Creek
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Delaware legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,347 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pike Creek
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pike Creek
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pike Creek
3.2

How Dennison Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dennison Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 013612Pike Creek: 3.63.6Pike Creekparent cityCounty: 3.43.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 40Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 2.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2011)
  • 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 100030136122010: 3 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2011: 7 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (2.34/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (4.69/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (4.69/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (2.34/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (1.25/100 renter HHs)2017: 6 filings (2.50/100 renter HHs)2018: 3 filings (1.25/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 34Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.33×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tampa, FL as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Dennison Ridge. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dennison Ridge

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pike Creek eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the New Castle County average of 5.7 and in line with the Delaware statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 14th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 10003013612

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 10003013612?

Census tract 10003013612 in the Dennison Ridge neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 10003013612?

Median gross rent is $2,347/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 10003013612?

1.4% of residents in tract 10003013612 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,541.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 10003013612?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 31th, minority 58th, housing 36th.
Q5

Is tract 10003013612 considered part of Dennison Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 10003013612 fall within Dennison Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 10003013612?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 40 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 10003013612 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.91% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 10003013612 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tampa, FL), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 10003013612 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 10003013612 compare to Pike Creek overall?

Tract 10003013612 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Pike Creek at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pike Creek eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pike Creek

Top eight tracts in Pike Creek ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related