Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 12019030209 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12019030209 · Clay, FL · pop 4,397

How risky is Clay in Clay County for landlords? Census tract 12019030209 scores 4.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 66% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,400 monthly, set against $79,375 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 36% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 12% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,720
Renter share35.6%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate14.4%
Median income$79,375

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 45 tracts In Clay
Elevated
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#2,623 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
National
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clay and the region

Centroid at 30.1042, -81.8163 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 12019030209 scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
14.4% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,400 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 12019030209 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 12019030209 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 030209County: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 40

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 12019030209

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Florida eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clay County average of 4.6 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 40th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12019030209

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12019030209?

Census tract 12019030209 in Clay scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12019030209?

Median gross rent is $1,400/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12019030209?

14.4% of residents in tract 12019030209 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,397.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12019030209?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 11th, minority 40th, housing 43th.
Related