Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 12019031301 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12019031301 · Clay, FL · pop 2,153

How risky is Clay for landlords? Census tract 12019031301 scores 4.5/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 24% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,338 a month while the average household earns $85,556 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 10% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 4% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,006
Renter share10.0%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$85,556

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#22 of 45 tracts In Clay
Moderate
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#3,685 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
National
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#65,113 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clay and the region

Centroid at 30.0029, -81.7321 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 12019031301 scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,338 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 12019031301 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 12019031301 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 031301County: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 12019031301

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Florida eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clay County average of 4.6 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 48th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12019031301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12019031301?

Census tract 12019031301 in Clay scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12019031301?

Median gross rent is $1,338/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12019031301?

7.0% of residents in tract 12019031301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,153.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12019031301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 84th, minority 12th, housing 45th.
Related