Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Paradise Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lake City

Tract 13063040407 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,343 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 13063040407 belongs to Paradise Park in Lake City, Georgia. It is home to 4,343 residents and scores 5.1/10, a moderate reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #47,962 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

28% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,245 a month while the average household earns $70,364 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 33% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 24% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,663
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$70,364

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Paradise Park
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lake City
Moderate
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#41 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Moderate
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#1,094 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake City and the region

Centroid at 33.6072, -84.3298 · click any tract to drill in

Why Paradise Park scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lake City
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,245 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake City
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake City
1.6

How Paradise Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Paradise Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 040407Lake City: 2.72.7Lake Cityparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 910Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 23.56%Avg annual filing rate
  • 35.7%Peak (2008)
  • 92Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630404072002: 61 filings (22.67/100 renter HHs)2005: 65 filings (22.73/100 renter HHs)2007: 89 filings (31.12/100 renter HHs)2008: 102 filings (35.66/100 renter HHs)2010: 79 filings (23.37/100 renter HHs)2011: 74 filings (18.05/100 renter HHs)2012: 76 filings (18.54/100 renter HHs)2013: 96 filings (23.41/100 renter HHs)2014: 93 filings (22.68/100 renter HHs)2015: 83 filings (20.24/100 renter HHs)2016: 92 filings (20.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 51% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 645Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Paradise Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Paradise Park

What moves this score most is economic stress at 3.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lake City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clayton County average of 6.4 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Asian and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 910 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 23.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 35.7% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040407

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040407?

Census tract 13063040407 in the Paradise Park neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040407?

Median gross rent is $1,245/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040407?

15.2% of residents in tract 13063040407 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,343.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040407?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 73th, minority 88th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040407 considered part of Paradise Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040407 fall within Paradise Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040407?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 910 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040407 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 23.56% of renter households, peaking at 35.7% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040407 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040407 compare to Lake City overall?

Tract 13063040407 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Lake City at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related