Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Burkshire Eviction Risk: Moderate , Conley
Tract 13063040410 · Clayton County, GA · pop 7,901 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Here is how census tract 13063040410, in Burkshire in Conley, looks to a landlord: a 6.8/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 7,901. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.
69% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $984 monthly, set against $52,441 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units2,909
Renter share36.1%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate14.0%
Median income$52,441
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
48
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Conley and the region
Centroid at 33.6279, -84.3099 · click any tract to drill in
Why Burkshire scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Conley
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.0% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$984 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Conley
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Conley
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Conley
9.1
How Burkshire compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 94%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 2,392Total filings over 11 yrs
- 35.37%Avg annual filing rate
- 36.9%Peak (2016)
- 292Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 52% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 1,316Total filings 2020-21
- 17.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.1%Housing insecurity
- 19.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.3%Food insecurity
- 30.4%SNAP enrollment
- 17.3%Transit barriers
- 19.7%No health insurance
- 20.0%Frequent mental distress
- 35.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Burkshire
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Conley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 29.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 19.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13063040410
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040410?
Census tract 13063040410 in the Burkshire neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13063040410?
Median gross rent is $984/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040410?
14.0% of residents in tract 13063040410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,901.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040410?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 82th, minority 97th, housing 48th.
Q5
Is tract 13063040410 considered part of Burkshire?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040410 fall within Burkshire (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040410?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,392 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040410 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 35.37% of renter households, peaking at 36.9% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13063040410 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13063040410 compare to Conley overall?
Tract 13063040410 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Conley at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Conley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Conley
Top eight tracts in Conley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related