Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally
Marlborough Eviction Risk: Moderate , Jonesboro
Tract 13063040536 ·
Clayton County, GA · pop 4,540 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Here is how census tract 13063040536, in the Marlborough area of Jonesboro, looks to a landlord: a 6.5/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 4,540. On the national scale it ranks #10,720 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 70% of renter households, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,426 a month against an average household income of $52,434 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%Stable renters 13%Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,039
Renter share44.3%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate37.2%
Median income$52,434
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Marlborough
Very Low
Within county
86th percentile
#11 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
High
Within state
87th percentile
#373 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
National
78th percentile
#18,240 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Jonesboro and the region
Centroid at 33.5278, -84.3818 · click any tract to drill in
Why Marlborough scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Jonesboro
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
37.2% poverty · this tract
9.3
Supply constraint
$1,426 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jonesboro
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jonesboro
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jonesboro
5.0
How Marlborough compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
89%Socioeconomic
64%Household composition
94%Racial/ethnic minority
23%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
546Total filings 2020-21
7.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Marlborough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
33.2%Housing insecurity
23.6%Utility-shutoff threat
40.0%Food insecurity
37.7%SNAP enrollment
20.2%Transit barriers
21.3%No health insurance
21.9%Frequent mental distress
39.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Marlborough
What moves this score most is economic stress at 9.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Jonesboro, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 33.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 23.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13063040536
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040536?
Census tract 13063040536 in the Marlborough neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13063040536?
Median gross rent is $1,426/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040536?
37.2% of residents in tract 13063040536 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,540.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040536?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 64th, minority 94th, housing 23th.
Q5
Is tract 13063040536 considered part of Marlborough?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040536 fall within Marlborough (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13063040536 struggle to pay rent?
About 33.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13063040536 compare to Jonesboro overall?
Tract 13063040536 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Jonesboro at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jonesboro; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.