Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Tiffany Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Jonesboro

Tract 13063040609 · Clayton County, GA · pop 7,868 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 13063040609 runs through the Tiffany Hills neighborhood of Jonesboro. With 7,868 residents, it scores 6.1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.

About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,359 monthly, set against $89,115 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 32% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units2,571
Renter share45.0%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$89,115

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tiffany Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Jonesboro
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#68 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Very Low
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#1,830 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Jonesboro and the region

Centroid at 33.5440, -84.3292 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tiffany Hills scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Jonesboro
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,359 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jonesboro
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jonesboro
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jonesboro
8.9

How Tiffany Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tiffany Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 040609Jonesboro: 3.03.0Jonesboroparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,339Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 39.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 49.8%Peak (2013)
  • 306Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630406092002: 173 filings (33.72/100 renter HHs)2005: 231 filings (30.84/100 renter HHs)2007: 355 filings (47.40/100 renter HHs)2008: 353 filings (47.13/100 renter HHs)2010: 296 filings (31.97/100 renter HHs)2011: 317 filings (39.58/100 renter HHs)2012: 297 filings (37.08/100 renter HHs)2013: 399 filings (49.81/100 renter HHs)2014: 293 filings (36.58/100 renter HHs)2015: 319 filings (39.83/100 renter HHs)2016: 306 filings (42.44/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 77% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,586Total filings 2020-21
  • 20.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tiffany Hills

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Jonesboro, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 81st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040609

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040609?

Census tract 13063040609 in the Tiffany Hills neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040609?

Median gross rent is $1,359/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040609?

4.7% of residents in tract 13063040609 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,868.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040609?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 68th, minority 92th, housing 84th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040609 considered part of Tiffany Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040609 fall within Tiffany Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040609?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,339 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040609 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 39.67% of renter households, peaking at 49.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040609 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040609 compare to Jonesboro overall?

Tract 13063040609 scores 2.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Jonesboro at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jonesboro; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Jonesboro

Top eight tracts in Jonesboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related