Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Country Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Powder Springs
Tract 13067031518 ·
Cobb County, GA · pop 2,579 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Eviction risk in Country Lake in Powder Springs centers on tract 13067031518, which scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 2,579 residents. That is riskier than about 69% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 57% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,696 a month against an average household income of $79,250 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 5%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units938
Renter share13.2%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$79,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Country Lake
Very High
Within county
81th percentile
#36 of 186 tracts In Cobb County
High
Within state
43th percentile
#1,583 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
National
37th percentile
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Powder Springs and the region
Centroid at 33.8844, -84.6327 · click any tract to drill in
Why Country Lake scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Powder Springs
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,696 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Powder Springs
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Powder Springs
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Powder Springs
5.0
How Country Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
45%Socioeconomic
36%Household composition
85%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
246Total filings 2020-21
3.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Country Lake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
18.2%Housing insecurity
12.2%Utility-shutoff threat
20.3%Food insecurity
16.1%SNAP enrollment
10.9%Transit barriers
14.5%No health insurance
16.8%Frequent mental distress
28.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Country Lake
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Powder Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cobb County average of 5.5 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 18.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13067031518
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13067031518?
Census tract 13067031518 in the Country Lake neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13067031518?
Median gross rent is $1,696/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13067031518?
16.2% of residents in tract 13067031518 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,579.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13067031518?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 36th, minority 85th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 13067031518 considered part of Country Lake?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13067031518 fall within Country Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13067031518 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13067031518 compare to Powder Springs overall?
Tract 13067031518 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Powder Springs at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Powder Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.