Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally

Woodland Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , North Druid Hills

Tract 13089021502 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,484 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Eviction risk in the Woodland Hills neighborhood of North Druid Hills centers on tract 13089021502, which scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 4,484 residents. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 55% of renter households, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,817 monthly, set against $98,967 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 24% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units2,445
Renter share53.8%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$98,967

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Woodland Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In North Druid Hills
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#126 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Low
Within state
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#1,721 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Druid Hills and the region

Centroid at 33.8173, -84.3412 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodland Hills scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Druid Hills
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,817 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Druid Hills
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Druid Hills
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Druid Hills
7.0

How Woodland Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodland Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 021502North Druid Hills: 2.72.7North Druid Hillsparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,042Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 10.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.2%Peak (2012)
  • 131Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890215022004: 98 filings (8.64/100 renter HHs)2007: 131 filings (11.53/100 renter HHs)2011: 149 filings (11.85/100 renter HHs)2012: 191 filings (15.19/100 renter HHs)2013: 127 filings (10.10/100 renter HHs)2014: 88 filings (7.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 127 filings (10.10/100 renter HHs)2016: 131 filings (9.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 34% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,687Total filings 2020-21
  • 22.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodland Hills

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Druid Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,042 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 10.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.2% of renter households in 2012.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021502?

Census tract 13089021502 in the Woodland Hills neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021502?

Median gross rent is $1,817/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021502?

9.8% of residents in tract 13089021502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,484.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 2th, minority 55th, housing 32th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021502 considered part of Woodland Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021502 fall within Woodland Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,042 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.44% of renter households, peaking at 15.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021502 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021502 compare to North Druid Hills overall?

Tract 13089021502 scores 3.1/10, higher than the parent city of North Druid Hills at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Druid Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Druid Hills

Top eight tracts in North Druid Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related