Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally
Embry Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Tucker
Tract 13089021711 ·
DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,669 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 6.1/10, tract 13089021711 in Embry Hills in Tucker ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,669 residents. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 76% of renter households, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,684 a month while the average household earns $120,227 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 6%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units876
Renter share25.2%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate23.0%
Median income$120,227
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#3 of 5 tracts In Embry Hills
Moderate
Within county
49th percentile
#104 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
48th percentile
#1,465 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
National
41th percentile
#49,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tucker and the region
Centroid at 33.8849, -84.2591 · click any tract to drill in
Why Embry Hills scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
23.0% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
5.0
How Embry Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
83%Socioeconomic
92%Household composition
78%Racial/ethnic minority
75%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
597Total filings 2020-21
7.9Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Embry Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
14.6%Housing insecurity
8.6%Utility-shutoff threat
17.6%Food insecurity
12.3%SNAP enrollment
9.3%Transit barriers
18.1%No health insurance
15.0%Frequent mental distress
25.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Embry Hills
What moves this score most is economic stress at 5.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tucker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13089021711
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021711?
Census tract 13089021711 in the Embry Hills neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13089021711?
Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021711?
23.0% of residents in tract 13089021711 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,669.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021711?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 92th, minority 78th, housing 75th.
Q5
Is tract 13089021711 considered part of Embry Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021711 fall within Embry Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13089021711 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13089021711 compare to Tucker overall?
Tract 13089021711 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Tucker at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.