Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Brook Hollow Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tucker

Tract 13089021911 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,949 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

For landlords sizing up the Brook Hollow area of Tucker, census tract 13089021911 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 7.5/10. It lands near the 99th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 64% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,372 monthly, set against $46,938 in average yearly household income, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 95% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 60% Stable renters 34% Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units1,222
Renter share94.6%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate37.9%
Median income$46,938

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Brook Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#421 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8177, -84.1908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Brook Hollow scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
37.9% poverty · this tract
9.5
Supply constraint
$1,372 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Brook Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Brook Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 021911Tucker: 2.82.8Tuckerparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 4,177Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 93.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 224.2%Peak (2007)
  • 365Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890219112004: 501 filings (113.30/100 renter HHs)2007: 807 filings (224.17/100 renter HHs)2011: 507 filings (71.41/100 renter HHs)2012: 517 filings (72.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 500 filings (70.42/100 renter HHs)2014: 552 filings (77.75/100 renter HHs)2015: 428 filings (60.28/100 renter HHs)2016: 365 filings (53.83/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 27% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,661Total filings 2020-21
  • 35.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 81 filings (810.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 116 filings (1,160.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 124 filings (1,240.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 78 filings (780.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 75 filings (750.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 91 filings (910.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 97 filings (970.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Brook Hollow

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tucker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 4,177 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 93.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 224.2% of renter households in 2007.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021911

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021911?

Census tract 13089021911 in the Brook Hollow neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021911?

Median gross rent is $1,372/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021911?

37.9% of residents in tract 13089021911 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,949.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021911?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 93th, minority 99th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021911 considered part of Brook Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021911 fall within Brook Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021911?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 4,177 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021911 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 93.00% of renter households, peaking at 224.2% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021911 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021911 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021911 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Tucker at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related