Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

North Highlands Eviction Risk: Lower , Druid Hills

Tract 13089022401 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,002 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Here is how census tract 13089022401, in North Highlands in Druid Hills, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 4,002. That is riskier than about 81% of US census tracts.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,029 a month against an average household income of $113,975 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 27% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,933
Renter share45.8%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate9.3%
Median income$113,975

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In North Highlands
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Druid Hills
Very High
Within county
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#168 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#2,209 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Druid Hills and the region

Centroid at 33.7884, -84.3431 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Highlands scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Druid Hills
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.3% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$2,029 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Druid Hills
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Druid Hills
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Druid Hills
5.4

How North Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 022401Druid Hills: 2.62.6Druid Hillsparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 242Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 3.53%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.5%Peak (2007)
  • 28Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890224012004: 44 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)2007: 49 filings (6.45/100 renter HHs)2011: 18 filings (1.85/100 renter HHs)2012: 31 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)2013: 44 filings (4.53/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2016: 28 filings (4.09/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 322Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Highlands

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Druid Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089022401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089022401?

Census tract 13089022401 in the North Highlands neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089022401?

Median gross rent is $2,029/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089022401?

9.3% of residents in tract 13089022401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,002.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089022401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 3th, minority 45th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 13089022401 considered part of North Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089022401 fall within North Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089022401?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 242 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089022401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.53% of renter households, peaking at 6.5% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089022401 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089022401 compare to Druid Hills overall?

Tract 13089022401 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Druid Hills at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Druid Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 13089022401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Druid Hills

Top eight tracts in Druid Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related