Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Oakhurst Eviction Risk: Lower , Decatur

Tract 13089022700 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 5,414 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.2/10 for census tract 13089022700 reflects conditions in Oakhurst in Decatur, Georgia. That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 54% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,772 a month while the average household earns $196,842 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 6% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,610
Renter share13.4%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$196,842

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Oakhurst
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Decatur
Low
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#195 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#2,675 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Decatur and the region

Centroid at 33.7605, -84.3039 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oakhurst scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Decatur
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,772 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Decatur
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Decatur
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Decatur
4.2

How Oakhurst compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oakhurst risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 022700Decatur: 2.62.6Decaturparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 176Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 4.72%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.4%Peak (2011)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890227002004: 35 filings (6.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 15 filings (3.06/100 renter HHs)2011: 51 filings (11.36/100 renter HHs)2012: 40 filings (8.91/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (3.34/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (1.34/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (1.14/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 89% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 94Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oakhurst. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oakhurst

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Decatur eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 11% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089022700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089022700?

Census tract 13089022700 in the Oakhurst neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089022700?

Median gross rent is $1,772/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089022700?

4.6% of residents in tract 13089022700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,414.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089022700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 17th, minority 52th, housing 46th.
Q5

Is tract 13089022700 considered part of Oakhurst?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089022700 fall within Oakhurst (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089022700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 176 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089022700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.72% of renter households, peaking at 11.4% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089022700 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089022700 compare to Decatur overall?

Tract 13089022700 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Decatur at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Decatur eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 13089022700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 11% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Decatur

Top eight tracts in Decatur ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related