Census Tract · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Tiger Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 13241970303 ·
Rabun County, GA · pop 2,714 · 28% of tract blocks fall in Tiger
Census tract 13241970303 covers part of Tiger, GA, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,714. What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 10/10.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%Stable renters 15%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,080
Renter share25.1%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate16.8%
Median income$55,227
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Tiger
Moderate
Within county
100th percentile
#1 of 8 tracts In Rabun County
Very High
Within state
76th percentile
#681 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
National
61th percentile
#32,842 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tiger and the region
Centroid at 34.7986, -83.4816 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tiger scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tiger
2.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.1
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.8% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$2,050 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tiger
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tiger
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tiger
8.5
How Tiger compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.3%Housing insecurity
6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
13.9%Food insecurity
11.8%SNAP enrollment
7.7%Transit barriers
12.2%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
35.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tiger
The voucher gap is 103.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. At $2,050 a month, rents run 41% under what the rest of Tiger commands.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10. Annualized rent equals 45% of average household income of $55,227, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.5/10.
It sits 1.2 points above the Rabun County average of 3.8. On the national scale it lands near the 61st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.7/10.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 13241970303
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13241970303?
Census tract 13241970303 in Tiger scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13241970303?
Median gross rent is $2,050/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13241970303?
16.8% of residents in tract 13241970303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,714.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13241970303?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 51th, minority 27th, housing 80th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 13241970303 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 13241970303 compare to Tiger overall?
Tract 13241970303 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Tiger at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tiger; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.