Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Good Hope Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 13297110200 · Walton County, GA · pop 5,388 · 6% of tract blocks fall in Good Hope

The Moderate-tier score of 4.1/10 for census tract 13297110200 reflects conditions in Good Hope, Georgia. That is riskier than about 14% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 19% of renter households, a modest level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,080 a month while the average household earns $73,438 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 20% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,195
Renter share24.6%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$73,438

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Good Hope
Moderate
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 20 tracts In Walton County
Elevated
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#1,956 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Good Hope and the region

Centroid at 33.7968, -83.6014 · click any tract to drill in

Why Good Hope scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Good Hope
3.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,080 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Good Hope
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Good Hope
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Good Hope
2.9

How Good Hope compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Good Hope risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 110200Good Hope: 1.71.7Good Hopeparent cityCounty: 3.03.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 281Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 13.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.1%Peak (2010)
  • 39Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 132971102002004: 31 filings (18.87/100 renter HHs)2006: 31 filings (9.73/100 renter HHs)2007: 49 filings (15.38/100 renter HHs)2010: 52 filings (17.05/100 renter HHs)2013: 30 filings (9.43/100 renter HHs)2015: 49 filings (15.41/100 renter HHs)2016: 39 filings (10.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 26% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Good Hope

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Good Hope, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Walton County average of 5.5 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13297110200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13297110200?

Census tract 13297110200 in Good Hope scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13297110200?

Median gross rent is $1,080/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13297110200?

8.2% of residents in tract 13297110200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,388.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13297110200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 12th, minority 20th, housing 32th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13297110200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 281 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 13297110200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.84% of renter households, peaking at 17.1% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13297110200 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13297110200 compare to Good Hope overall?

Tract 13297110200 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Good Hope at 1.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Good Hope; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related