Tract 13297110510 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13297110510 · Walton County, GA · pop 3,422
13297110510 is a census tract in Walton County, GA. It scores 3/10 for landlords. 100% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Walton County and the region
Centroid at 33.7941, -83.8817 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 13297110510 scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 13297110510 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 47%Household composition
- 9%Racial/ethnic minority
- 4%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.6%Food insecurity
- 8.4%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 10.1%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 28.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 13297110510
Cost burden runs 100% here against 49.9% across Walton County. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.6/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2/10.
Against the Walton County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 1% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.8/10. Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.