Census Tract · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally
Notus Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 16027021904 ·
Canyon County, ID · pop 3,565 · 9% of tract blocks fall in Notus
Tract 16027021904 sits in Notus, ID, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.7/10. Population here is 3,565. Against Canyon County at 42.6%, 22% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 11%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,306
Renter share14.4%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$61,053
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Notus
Moderate
Within county
66th percentile
#19 of 54 tracts In Canyon County
Elevated
Within state
65th percentile
#160 of 456 tracts In Idaho
Elevated
National
36th percentile
#54,273 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Notus and the region
Centroid at 43.7523, -116.7838 · click any tract to drill in
Why Notus scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Notus
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Idaho legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$946 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Notus
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Notus
4.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Notus
5.5
How Notus compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.9%Housing insecurity
9.1%Utility-shutoff threat
18.3%Food insecurity
12.9%SNAP enrollment
10.0%Transit barriers
16.6%No health insurance
17.3%Frequent mental distress
41.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Notus
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $946, 16% below the Notus average. On the national scale it lands near the 35th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.9/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Canyon County average of 3.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $61,053.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 16027021904
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 16027021904?
Census tract 16027021904 in Notus scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 16027021904?
Median gross rent is $946/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 16027021904?
9.5% of residents in tract 16027021904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,565.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 16027021904?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 90th, minority 57th, housing 41th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 16027021904 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 16027021904 compare to Notus overall?
Tract 16027021904 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Notus at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Notus; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.