Arizona Eviction Risk: Elevated , Burnham
Tract 17031550100 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,201 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 7.5/10, tract 17031550100 in the Arizona area of Chicago, IL reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. 37% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Burnham and the region
Centroid at 41.6632, -87.5360 · click any tract to drill in
Why Arizona scores 7.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Arizona compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 87%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 71%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 13%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 397Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.22%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.3%Peak (2015)
- 41Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Arizona. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.4%Housing insecurity
- 12.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.1%Food insecurity
- 25.6%SNAP enrollment
- 13.3%Transit barriers
- 21.5%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 34.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Arizona
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Average gross rent is $1,169, 19% below the Chicago average.
Adults with no health insurance runs 21.5% against 11.3% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 23.4% against 14.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 397 evictions over 15 years of observation.
Cost burden runs 41% here against 45.6% across Cook County. The worst year on record was 2015, when 4.3% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 3.2% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 17031550100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031550100?
What is the average rent in tract 17031550100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031550100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031550100?
Is tract 17031550100 considered part of Arizona?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031550100?
What share of households in tract 17031550100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031550100 compare to Burnham overall?
Was tract 17031550100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Burnham
Top eight tracts in Burnham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.