Within neighborhood
40
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,906 of 84,120 nationally
Mount Pleasant Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031590700 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,914 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
17031590700 is a census tract in the Mount Pleasant area of Chicago, IL. It scores 6.6/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,914 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.2/10.
Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units993
Renter share27.0%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate10.4%
Median income$77,344
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
79
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8261, -87.6628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Pleasant scores 6.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
10.4% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,091 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Mount Pleasant compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 38%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 215Total filings over 15 yrs
- 2.98%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.7%Peak (2001)
- 12Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 54% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mount Pleasant. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.1%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.5%Food insecurity
- 18.2%SNAP enrollment
- 11.5%Transit barriers
- 20.9%No health insurance
- 15.4%Frequent mental distress
- 27.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mount Pleasant
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. At $1,091 a month, rents run 24% under what the rest of Chicago commands. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Adults with no health insurance runs 20.9% against 11.3% nationally. Food insecurity runs 26.5% against 17.8% nationally.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 215 filings here across 15 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2001, when 4.7% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 82nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 5.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031590700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031590700?
Census tract 17031590700 in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031590700?
Median gross rent is $1,091/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031590700?
10.4% of residents in tract 17031590700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,914.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031590700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 9th, minority 90th, housing 38th.
Q5
Is tract 17031590700 considered part of Mount Pleasant?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031590700 fall within Mount Pleasant (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031590700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 215 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031590700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.98% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031590700 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031590700 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031590700 scores 6.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031590700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 38% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Mayfair
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Homan Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Park Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Rosemoor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Becks Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Trumbull Park Homes
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Crawford
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related