Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally
Clearing Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031640500 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,132 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 17031640500 covers part of the Clearing area of Chicago, IL, and scores 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,132 residents. The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,632
Renter share24.1%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$76,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
52
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
77
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7757, -87.7910 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clearing scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Clearing compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 42%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 4%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 138Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.28%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.9%Peak (2009)
- 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Clearing. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.7%Housing insecurity
- 7.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.1%Food insecurity
- 13.1%SNAP enrollment
- 8.4%Transit barriers
- 15.6%No health insurance
- 15.1%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Clearing
Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Average gross rent is $1,179, 18% below the Chicago average.
Cost burden runs 40% here against 45.6% across Cook County. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 138 filings here across 15 tracked years.
Filings peaked in 2009 at 6.9% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.3% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 81st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.2/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031640500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031640500?
Census tract 17031640500 in the Clearing neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031640500?
Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031640500?
8.1% of residents in tract 17031640500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,132.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031640500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 42th, minority 64th, housing 60th.
Q5
Is tract 17031640500 considered part of Clearing?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031640500 fall within Clearing (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031640500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 138 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031640500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.28% of renter households, peaking at 6.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031640500 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031640500 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031640500 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031640500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 4% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Cragin
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
North Kenwood
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Chicago Heights
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
New Auburn
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
West Haven
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Marshall Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Canaryville
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Auburn Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related