Schorsch Forest View Eviction Risk: Lower , Chicago
Tract 17031810501 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,259 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 17031810501 sits in the Schorsch Forest View area of Norridge, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.8/10. Population here is 5,259. 33% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9603, -87.8260 · click any tract to drill in
Why Schorsch Forest View scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Schorsch Forest View compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 39%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 73%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 12%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 50Total filings over 14 yrs
- 2.48%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.6%Peak (2010)
- 4Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Schorsch Forest View. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.2%Food insecurity
- 9.7%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 8.9%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Schorsch Forest View
At $2,050 a month, rents run 43% over what the rest of Norridge commands. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.3 points.
34% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Cook County average of 45.6%. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.6/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.8/10. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. The voucher gap is 16.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 50 filings here across 14 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2010, when 2.6% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.3/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 17031810501
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031810501?
What is the average rent in tract 17031810501?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031810501?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031810501?
Is tract 17031810501 considered part of Schorsch Forest View?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031810501?
What share of households in tract 17031810501 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031810501 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031810501 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.