Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Field Park Eviction Risk: Lower , La Grange Park
Tract 17031819801 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 5,161 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 17031819801 sits in the Field Park area of Western Springs, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 5,161. about one in five of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Cook County average of 45.6%.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 8%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,625
Renter share9.9%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$225,650
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Field Park
Very Low
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In La Grange Park
Very High
Within county
2th percentile
#1,307 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
12th percentile
#2,873 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across La Grange Park and the region
Centroid at 41.8122, -87.8974 · click any tract to drill in
Why Field Park scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from La Grange Park
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,949 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from La Grange Park
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from La Grange Park
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from La Grange Park
2.8
How Field Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
3%Socioeconomic
9%Household composition
20%Racial/ethnic minority
11%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
15Total filings over 8 yrs
1.71%Avg annual filing rate
3.6%Peak (2010)
1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings dropped 100% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Field Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
4.8%Housing insecurity
2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
4.7%Food insecurity
3.3%SNAP enrollment
3.2%Transit barriers
3.3%No health insurance
11.3%Frequent mental distress
16.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Field Park
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.1 points. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.1/10.
Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Housing insecurity runs 4.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 15 filings here across 8 tracked years. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.3% against 11.3% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2010 at 3.6% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 10% of average household income of $225,650, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031819801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031819801?
Census tract 17031819801 in the Field Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031819801?
Median gross rent is $1,949/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031819801?
2.9% of residents in tract 17031819801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,161.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031819801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 9th, minority 20th, housing 11th.
Q5
Is tract 17031819801 considered part of Field Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031819801 fall within Field Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031819801?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 15 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 17031819801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.71% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031819801 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031819801 compare to La Grange Park overall?
Tract 17031819801 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of La Grange Park at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from La Grange Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in La Grange Park
Top eight tracts in La Grange Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.