Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Archer Limits Eviction Risk: Lower , Chicago

Tract 17031820800 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,431 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 17031820800 sits in the Archer Limits area of Forest View, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 3,431 residents. around two-thirds of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Cook County average of 45.6%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 4% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,047
Renter share14.1%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$85,036

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Archer Limits
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chicago
Moderate
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,312 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#2,873 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.8073, -87.7736 · click any tract to drill in

Why Archer Limits scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,413 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
3.1

How Archer Limits compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Archer Limits risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 820800Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 87Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 4.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.3%Peak (2013)
  • 10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318208002001: 2 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2002: 7 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (1.96/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (2.38/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (5.95/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2008: 7 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2010: 10 filings (5.41/100 renter HHs)2011: 7 filings (3.98/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (1.70/100 renter HHs)2013: 11 filings (6.25/100 renter HHs)2014: 7 filings (3.98/100 renter HHs)2015: 10 filings (5.68/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 400% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Archer Limits. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Archer Limits

It sits 3.1 points below the Cook County average of 6.1. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.1/10.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.8/10. The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Running hot, local political climate reads 7.8/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 20.0% against 11.3% nationally.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 87 filings here across 15 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 25.5% against 17.8% nationally.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 6.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031820800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031820800?

Census tract 17031820800 in the Archer Limits neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031820800?

Median gross rent is $1,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031820800?

4.4% of residents in tract 17031820800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,431.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031820800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 42th, minority 77th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 17031820800 considered part of Archer Limits?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031820800 fall within Archer Limits (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031820800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 87 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031820800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.29% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031820800 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031820800 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031820800 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031820800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related