Neighborhood · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally
Clarkdale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031822000 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 4,299 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
17031822000 is a census tract in the Clarkdale area of Hometown, IL. It scores 4.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,299. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 31% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 19%Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,916
Renter share27.3%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$59,265
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29th percentile
#6 of 8 tracts In Clarkdale
Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Chicago
Moderate
Within county
18th percentile
#1,090 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
42th percentile
#1,908 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7312, -87.7311 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clarkdale scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$812 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
3.5
How Clarkdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 33
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
62%Socioeconomic
44%Household composition
56%Racial/ethnic minority
5%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.9%Housing insecurity
7.6%Utility-shutoff threat
16.9%Food insecurity
14.2%SNAP enrollment
8.2%Transit barriers
11.6%No health insurance
16.4%Frequent mental distress
29.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Clarkdale
Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10. It sits 1.7 points below the Cook County average of 6.1.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 2/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.8/10. Average gross rent is $812, 20% above the Hometown average.
Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The filing record is not thin: 93 evictions over 15 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2014 at 3.7% of renter households.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.9/10. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $59,265, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031822000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031822000?
Census tract 17031822000 in the Clarkdale neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031822000?
Median gross rent is $812/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031822000?
8.2% of residents in tract 17031822000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,299.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031822000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 44th, minority 56th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 17031822000 considered part of Clarkdale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031822000 fall within Clarkdale (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031822000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 93 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031822000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.69% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031822000 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031822000 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031822000 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031822000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.