Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally
Hampshire Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 17089850706 · Kane County, IL · pop 1,654 · 30% of tract blocks fall in Hampshire
Census tract 17089850706 covers part of Hampshire, IL, and scores 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,654 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units828
Renter share2.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$91,971
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
54
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
National
47
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hampshire and the region
Centroid at 42.1266, -88.5296 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hampshire scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hampshire
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hampshire
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hampshire
4.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hampshire
6.7
How Hampshire compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 3%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 7%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.0%Food insecurity
- 5.0%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 5.3%No health insurance
- 10.9%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hampshire
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.8/10. Food insecurity runs 6.0% against 17.8% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 4.9% against 14.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 2% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.1/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Kane County average of 4.1 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17089850706
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17089850706?
Census tract 17089850706 in Hampshire scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 17089850706?
3.8% of residents in tract 17089850706 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,654.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 17089850706?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 9th, minority 7th, housing 3th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 17089850706 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 17089850706 compare to Hampshire overall?
Tract 17089850706 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Hampshire at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hampshire; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hampshire
Top eight tracts in Hampshire ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related