Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
NN2 WH Eviction Risk: Lower , Twin Grove
Tract 17113005201 ·
McLean County, IL · pop 956 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 17113005201 sits in the NN2 WH area of Twin Grove, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 956. Against McLean County at 34.8%, 15% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 5%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units412
Renter share6.3%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$113,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In NN2 WH
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Twin Grove
Moderate
Within county
4th percentile
#45 of 47 tracts In McLean County
Very Low
Within state
12th percentile
#2,873 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Twin Grove and the region
Centroid at 40.5067, -89.0708 · click any tract to drill in
Why NN2 WH scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Twin Grove
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,115 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Twin Grove
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Twin Grove
2.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Twin Grove
7.0
How NN2 WH compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
3%Socioeconomic
26%Household composition
5%Racial/ethnic minority
12%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.2%Housing insecurity
3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
6.8%Food insecurity
5.6%SNAP enrollment
4.1%Transit barriers
4.5%No health insurance
12.7%Frequent mental distress
23.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in NN2 WH
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10.
It sits 1.6 points below the McLean County average of 4.6. The severe-burden share is 15%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 6.8% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.8/10.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 1.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $113,000, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17113005201
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17113005201?
Census tract 17113005201 in the NN2 WH neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17113005201?
Median gross rent is $1,115/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17113005201?
5.7% of residents in tract 17113005201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 956.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17113005201?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 26th, minority 5th, housing 12th.
Q5
Is tract 17113005201 considered part of NN2 WH?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17113005201 fall within NN2 WH (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 17113005201 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 17113005201 compare to Twin Grove overall?
Tract 17113005201 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Twin Grove at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Twin Grove; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.